Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cameron Maxwell's avatar

I think what draws people to GoT and other analogous dark fantasy isn't the cachet of "serious genre literature", or the pleasures of schadenfreude, or to see classical notions of heroism immolated. It's in seeing characters retain and strive for humanism, sardonically and imperfectly, in a world marred by bummer big arcs bending definitively away from justice. Tyrion and Bronn and The Hound are what linger for me. Not the set pieces. Not the Walkers. Not Kit Harrington's brooding. It's the Bogie-in-Casablanca angle that's appealing; the begrudging sort-of-heroism. It feels real and authentic because, well, it is. And even half-assed heroics look valiant against backdrops of despair.

Expand full comment
Dawson Eliasen's avatar

I haven’t read any Salvatore. But my usual gripe with high fantasy is basically that high fantasy seems overly indulgent. Much of the book ends up being about the world building: describing magic systems, cities, quirky culture and customs and religions. I end up wondering, is this book even for me (the reader)? Or is it for the author--to spend time in a fun world of his/her creation? Just having a blast imagining all the aspects of the world? Compared to dark fantasy, where the fantasy world just feels like the setting and the story is really driven by the characters. Have you experienced that?

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts